Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starlight Investments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to lack of discussion in 3 weeks. No prejudice against renomination at any time. (non-admin closure) --Jakob (talk) 14:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Starlight Investments

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable company JDDJS (talk) 19:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The globe and Mail ref cited seems to indicate that it makes Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), although the article needs expansion and more refs added. - Ahunt (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 10:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The 2012 article in The Globe & Mail is a routine report on a deal; it provides a verifiable reference on the firm's existence but I think falls short of demonstrating that it is of encyclopaedic notability. Nor are multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) turning up better. (Note that there are firms of the same name in Texas and Wales.) AllyD (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.